FoundryNet / Compare
Protocol comparison

Protocol comparisons

Written by the layer that has to parse both sides into one schema. Every comparison ends the same way — the protocol choice stops mattering once the output is canonical — but the reasons to pick one differ, and they are real.


ComparisonWhy people ask
Modbus TCP vs OPC UAThe default retrofit question. You have a plant of Modbus devices, a new machine arrives speaking OPC UA, and someone has to decide what the site standard is.
Modbus TCP vs MQTT / Sparkplug BThe question behind every gateway purchase: should the device be polled, or should it publish?
MTConnect vs OPC UAThe machine-tool standards question. Both claim the shop floor, and several controllers now expose both simultaneously.
BACnet/IP vs Modbus TCPThe question that appears the first time a data centre or a factory tries to put building systems and process equipment on one dashboard.
Modbus RTU vs Modbus TCPNot really a protocol choice — a wiring choice. Same data model, same registers, entirely different operational life.
MQTT / Sparkplug B vs OPC UAThe architecture question for a greenfield IIoT build: broker in the middle, or client-server to each asset?
PROFINET / S7 vs EtherNet/IPThe one that is really a question about which controller vendor you already own.
SunSpec vs Modbus TCPThe solar and storage question. SunSpec is not an alternative to Modbus — it runs on top of it — but the choice of whether to implement it is real.
DNP3 vs Modbus TCPThe utility SCADA question, and the one place where Modbus's simplicity is genuinely a liability.
J1939 (CAN) vs OPC UAThe mixed-fleet question — a company that runs both vehicles and a plant, and wants one data layer over both.
Get the thesis behind this infrastructure — The Machine Agent, weekly.