FoundryNet / Compare / PROFINET / S7 vs EtherNet/IP
Protocol comparison

PROFINET / S7 vs EtherNet/IP

The one that is really a question about which controller vendor you already own.

Get an API key All 14 adapters

Side by side

The comparison

PROFINET / S7EtherNet/IP
SpecificationIEC 61158/61784 (PROFINET), S7comm over ISO-on-TCPODVA CIP over Ethernet
First published20032001
TransportEthernet; S7comm on TCP 102TCP 44818 (explicit), UDP 2222 (implicit I/O)
Data modelDevice model defined by a GSDML file and the engineering project. S7 access is by memory area — DB numbers, byte and bit offsets.CIP objects with classes, instances and attributes; tag-based access on Logix controllers with named, typed program tags.
DiscoveryDCP discovery finds devices; what is *inside* a data block is defined only in the TIA project.ListIdentity for devices; EDS files describe them. Logix tag lists are readable at runtime.
SecurityMinimal in classic S7comm. Newer firmware adds access levels and TLS.CIP Security exists; deployment is uneven.
Polling or subscriptionCyclic real-time I/O plus acyclic reads. S7comm reads are request/response.Explicit messaging (request/response) and implicit I/O (cyclic).
Implementation complexityHigh, and front-loaded into engineering rather than into runtime.Moderate. Named tags make Logix far friendlier than register maps.
Typical industriesSiemens-centric plants: automotive, process, packaging, machine tools with 840D.Rockwell-dominant plants: North American discrete manufacturing, material handling, packaging.
Forge supportAdapter shipped. 6 OEM families mapped.Adapter shipped. 10 OEM families mapped.

Where each one wins

PROFINET / S7

Strength. Deterministic cyclic I/O with real-time classes that Modbus cannot approach.

What it costs you. Tag meaning lives in an engineering project, not on the wire. Without the symbol table, DB100.DBD24 is four bytes.

PROFINET / S7 adapter →

EtherNet/IP

Strength. Named, typed controller tags — the semantics are at least *human* even if not standard.

What it costs you. Tag naming is a house style per integrator, so it is exactly as portable as the naming convention was disciplined.

EtherNet/IP adapter →

Both are industrial Ethernet with cyclic I/O and an object or device model. The difference that matters at the data layer is naming: Logix hands you named, typed tags, while S7 hands you a byte offset into a data block. That single difference is why a Rockwell integration starts faster and a Siemens integration needs the engineering project.


The Forge angle

Whichever one you pick, the output is the same

Forge is not an argument for a protocol. It is the layer that makes the choice stop mattering downstream: 16,908 curated mappings across 14 protocol adapters, resolving to 366 canonical fields with enforced units and physics bounds.

Two devices, two protocols, two vendors, two entirely different tag names — and one canonical field out. Both of these are real mappings from the corpus, not illustrations.

PROFINET / S7 — Siemens

# raw tag on the wire
{"STUECKZAHL (cycles)": 1450}
# normalized
{"part_count": 1450}

EtherNet/IP — Mitsubishi

# raw tag on the wire
{"part_ct": 1450}
# normalized
{"part_count": 1450}

Same field: part_count. Same unit contract, same physics bounds, same shape. Your query does not need to know which protocol the reading arrived on.

# Try it against both, with no key and no account
docker run -p 8000:8000 ghcr.io/foundrynet/forge-sandbox

Keep reading

The protocol you pick matters less than the schema underneath. The Machine Agent, weekly. Read it →
Get the thesis behind this infrastructure — The Machine Agent, weekly.